The Platonic Science of Fullerene and World Peace

The national or tribal political will that puts modern science and technology to work, seeks to control economic employment for the masses and maintain a defense structure to ensure the continuation of political power. This can be done in the name of democracy, plutocracy, dictatorship, religion, monarchies, etc. They all compete to develop an aesthetic of emotional mind control to convince their subjects that they are better off than their competing nations or tribes. It follows that the idea of ​​a world government must constitute a threat to these various systems of mind control. However, it is possible to override this concern by using science to develop a code of sustainable medical ethics specifically designed to guide civilization toward a state of perpetual world peace rather than perpetual conflict. The only thing preventing this from happening is science itself.

As the full potential of nanotechnology emerges, nations with nuclear weapons at their disposal will begin to realize that they will soon no longer be protected by them. It is obvious that futuristic nanomachines will be able to mass produce undetectable nanoweapons of mass destruction and there are plenty of fanatics willing to do so who would be honored to use them against civilians. Some might declare this to be a natural sacrifice of people on an overpopulated planet. There will be plenty of high-ranking military personnel determined to use nanotechnology to stop religious fanatics. On the other hand, nanotechnology has the potential to create anything from very little, including building food and water. Without responsible science, those who control nanotechnology will bring hell on earth. However, with responsible science to guide them towards it, utopia is possible. To obtain that utopia, there must first be the scientific will to create it.

The fanatical will to wreak violent destruction is not limited to religious fanatics who inflict instant entropic destruction on innocent civilians. This fanatical will is also fundamentally basic to almost all highly trained scientists. The prevailing scientific worldview’s desire to drive civilians toward entropic destruction is just as fanatical, but it operates in a slower and more organized fashion. Scientists need to realize why this is an accurate description of the prevailing scientific mindset and disassociate themselves from an inner compulsion to worship destructive chaos.

Nobel laureate Lord Bertrand Russell and Albert Einstein used mathematics to convince themselves that people must worship the destruction of chaos. Russell’s most popular essay was titled ‘The Worship of a Free Man’ in which he wrote that scientists must abide by the law of physics that Einstein called the main law of all sciences, the law of universal chaos. In the end, Russell wrote, all human creative genius will be utterly destroyed within a universe in thermodynamic ruin. This fanatical mentality cannot be emotionally negatived by people continually telling each other to have a happy day. The time period for entropic human extinction, in nanometer terms, is not at all related to the length predicted by Russell and Einstein.

Arguing the complete opposite of the diabolical chaos cult, was the Platonic tradition of scientific philosophy which, during the 3rd century BC, created ‘Science for Ethical Purposes’. One may well ask, what makes Platonic logic so important in this matter of human survival? The answer to that question is that Platonic logic defined ‘evil’ as a destructive property of formless matter within the physical atom, which can emerge to destroy civilization.

The same mathematical logic that predicted this threat of nuclear destruction also applies to the misuse of nanotechnology. So, one may ask, who can be trusted to guide an ennobling ethical government for the benefit of all? Platonic “good” was defined as the health of an infinite universe. Therefore, the answer is that you can trust a medical science based on a sustainable infinite evolutionary ethic. The next question arises, how can one locate an infinite evolutionary ethic that works for the health of the universe when mainstream modern physics forbids its existence?

The answer to that question is obvious. Nanotechnology has shown that the molecule of emotion discovered in 1972 by Dr. Candace Pert is part of a complex dynamic system of fractal energy that extends its logic to a universal infinity in contradiction to the worldview of Russell and Einstein. The molecule of emotion continually updates the structure of the endocrine fluids that maintain human health within an infinite evolving universe. That process is the basis for the emerging science of quantum biology, which intertwines with the energies of chaos to evolve human consciousness. Quantum biology tells us that it is time to stop worshiping the god of chaos that the ancient Greeks called Diabolos.

Buckminster Fuller used Platonic ethical mathematics to develop his synergistic model of the universe, and the three 1996 Nobel laureates in chemistry named the basis of their new medical science Fullerene Chemistry. Fuller wrote a book called ‘Utopia or Forget’ in which he posited that we now have a choice between being governed by the law of chaos or by Platonic engineering principles of creation. For the non-scientist this means living in a universe governed by platonic love.

From the perspective of Fuller’s balanced energy, derived directly from Platonic mathematics, the necessary medical science can be conceived in which nanotechnology can be guided by a Platonic ethical oath, improving on the old Hippocratic one, used in current medicine. During the 18th and 19th centuries, a Ph.D. in science meant a Ph.D. in philosophy, and the great philosophers of the time, who made the great electromagnetic discoveries, used the mathematics belonging to Platonic ethical science to develop ethical electromagnetic physics. Any leading encyclopedia will explain that the discoverer of the electromagnetic field, Hans Christian Oersted, wrote his doctoral thesis, based on the electromagnetic ethics postulated by the philosopher of science Immanuel Kant.

Friedrich Schelling and Alexander Humboldt updated electromagnetic ethics in terms compatible with the recent discoveries made by nanotechnology. The Platonic tradition of philosophy classifies modern scientists as ignorant and barbaric engineers, fit only to help engineer continuing diabolical chaos. Although Kant’s work is widely seen as influencing 21st century scientific culture, it’s a good bet that very few scientists reading this article would have the faintest idea that anyone ever reasoned about some kind of electromagnetic ethics, or that scientists in the past wrote formulas to demonstrate how electromagnetic ethics balanced E=Mc2.

So, you might ask, is it true that I can’t even begin to reason about such things, even though my Ph.D. confirms me as a philosopher? Have I been taught that I cannot challenge Einstein’s entropic worldview? Am I aware that some scientists simply assume that the universe is infinite in order to derive practical solutions to complex engineering problems? Is it possible that I can only accelerate entropic chaos in all my reasoning unless I consider linking my hard-earned knowledge to the holographic reality of quantum biology?

These questions are quite serious. In terms of universal emotional energy, there is little difference between a suicide bomber speeding up instantaneous entropic chaos upon innocent people and the development of modern science doing the same thing in slow motion. Ignoring the existence of electromagnetic ethics within nanotechnology, huge machines are digging for raw materials for entropic industrial development and huge fishing boats are catching dolphins while nets rape the oceans. The perpetrators remain unaware of the potential of nanotechnology to produce both raw materials and food supplies from next to nothing.

It seems futile to try to say these things to a society hell-bent on accelerating destructive chaos and fearful of job opportunities through an economy that has turned the Kantian ethic for world peace on earth into an unattainable cancerous entropic concept of economic growth. Could it be that scientists are allowing their brilliant but lopsided formation to become entangled with emerging quantum biology? People need to be aware of what they are doing when they feel compelled to remain in complete servitude to any of the dictates of twentieth-century entropic mathematics, physics, politics, economics, and religious certitude. So they may be looking for ethical opportunities to become a responsible part of the future suprascience of nano-quantum biology.

Georg Cantor’s mathematics is now a fundamental part of modern science. It’s time to stop adding that he is the most reviled mathematician in history because of his goal to use his infinite mathematics to achieve world peace. The reader is urged to download ‘Physics of Life: The Dawn of Quantum Biology’ on Google to read about the NASA findings relevant to this article, published in the journal Nature and containing two subtitles ‘Nature knows some tricks that scientists don’t’ and ‘This could give us some clues in the quest for the development of quantum biology’.

© Professor Robert Pope, Advisor to the President for Oceania and Australasia at the Einstein-Galilei Institute for Theoretical Physics and Advanced Mathematics (IFM) Einstein-Galilei Institute for Theoretical Physics and Advanced Mathematics (IFM)